Jonathan Wacks -that is the most honest answer I've seen on topics like this in ages. In most settings, you will find the easiest acceptance of recorded findings (when audited) if there are pre-approved protocols that are available and used for their intended purpose when conducting an investigation. Written documentation/justification of the rationale and explanation of the logic that interprets the laboratory data is expected as part of the record. a redbook record of a laboratory investigation into an unexpected event or outcome).Įither way, recording/documenting is expected and required. Or are you possibly referring to the need to record/document the sequence of activities actually undertaken/completed in order to complete a task - with or without the prior existence of a formal standard protocol (e.g. David P Norby, PhD, CQE (ASQ) It's a bit difficult to discern from your question whether you are referring to the need to prepare formal written statements of the steps needed or required in order to acceptably complete a particular task (i.e.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |